Producción Científica

 

 

Fiscal transparency is known to influence the quality of public resource management, in terms of a more efficient and effective allocation of these scarce resources. In view of the relevance of this subject, the objective of this work was to produce a bibliometric study, at the global level, of the literature associated with the influence caused by fiscal transparency on the efficiency and effectiveness of public spending on health and also to undertake a brief literature review addressing the main concepts on the subject. The bibliometric analysis was carried out based on data collected from Scielo, Portal de Periodicos Capes (subject search), Scopus and Web of Science databases. Publications from the last 20 years were evaluated, identifying 131 authors and 52 scientific journals. The results show that the effects of fiscal transparency on the efficiency and effectiveness of public spending are the subject of scientific study in various social spheres, such as education, human development and public safety, among others. On the other hand, the health theme is the most addressed among authors and journals with at least two published articles.

 

 

Objective: To verify bibliometric indicators of the scientific production available in online journals that approach workplace bullying and nursing. Method: A bibliometric study making use of Bradford’s law, Zipf’s law, and textual statistics was carried out with publications in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, made available in national and international databases, from 2000 to 2016. Results: The sample was made up of 111 publications. The main authors had connections with 91 institutions distributed in 24 countries. The United States, Brazil, and Australia were the countries with the most publications. The populations of the studies were made up of nursing professionals and students, and the hospital environment was the most studied setting. The journals with a higher number of publications have international scientific influence. The terms that presented greater semantic power and high frequency in the abstracts were: bullying; assedio moral; and acoso laboral. Conclusion: Indicators showed that workplace bullying occurs in the nursing work environments of several countries, and the number of publications on this theme has tended to increase. Diversifying methods and study settings is important to contribute to the advancement of knowledge and fight against this violence.

 

 

Short Food Supply Chains (SFSCs) are forms of agrifood product circulation that have the aim of bringing together producers and consumers, promoting fair trade, and giving access to local foods. The study of SFSCs is a developing area of knowledge. The objective of the research was to perform a bibliometric analysis of the evolution and the current state of international scientific research on SFSCs and to identify trends and opportunities for research, specifically in Latin America. For this purpose, we carried a bibliometric analysis out, through the databases Dimensions and Redalyc, during the period of 2000 to 2021 and processed in the VOSviewer software. Results show a total of 253 documents and it was determined that Europe represents 67% of the research on SFSCs; however, a growing production of studies can be seen in North America and Latin America, primarily in case studies, which represent 25%. The areas of knowledge where there are more studies are the social sciences, administration and economy. The conclusion is that COVID-19, food security and agrifood policies are areas of opportunity for research linked to Short Food Supply Chains in Latin America.

 

 

Fraud has been a great evil for economies, society, and companies, given the instability and impacts it generates. This study aimed to analyze the evolution of scientific production on accounting fraud in organizations, based on a bibliometric study for the trend analysis. It was identified 246 scientific publications in the period 1978-2019 and 394 authors. The results verify the existing research interest in the subject, pointing out thematic trends in administration, auditing, corporate governance, and corruption, with risk as the main emerging theme. They also suggest future directions for researchers and contributions to the research development of the field of knowledge in question.

 

 

The Journal of Universal Computer Science is a monthly peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal covering all aspects of computer science, launched in 1994, so becoming twenty-five years old in 2019. In order to celebrate its anniversary, this study presents a bibliometric overview of the leading publication and citation trends occurring in the journal. The aim of the work is to identify the most relevant authors, institutions, countries, and analyze their evolution through time. The article uses the Web of Science Core Collection citations and the ACM Computing Classification System in order to search for the bibliographic information. Our study also develops a graphical mapping of the bibliometric material by using the visualization of similarities (VOS) viewer. With this software, the work analyzes bibliographic coupling, citation and co-citation analysis, co-authorship, and co-occurrence of keywords. The results underline the significant growth of the journal through time and its international diversity having publications from countries all over the world and covering a wide range of categories which confirms the “universal” character of the journal.

 

 

The aim of this study was to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia (RLP) journal in commemoration of its fiftieth anniversary in order to discover its evolution as a journal and its scientific production. We extracted a dataset from the Web of Science’s principal collection from 1975 to 2017. This contained a total sample of 2,163 scientific documents, which were processed using Excel and SciMat programmes. The bibliometric indicators used were H-Classics, TC2, identification of the most commonly cited authors and journals, and references. We used Lotka’s Law to analyse research productivity. Results showed that the content included 48.6% scientific articles and 42.1% book reviews. Spain had the highest number of articles published. Burrhus Skinner, Ruben Ardila, Rogelio Diaz Guerrero, and Albert Bandura were the most commonly cited authors. Analyses revealed certain strengths of and challenges faced by the RLP. Future research should compare these results with journals from other countries. (C) 2019 Fundacion Universitaria Konrad Lorenz.

 

 

The main objective of this research is to establish the most important advances and research related to the discipline of innovation and service marketing through scientific production within the restaurant industry through a bibliometric study of the literature in which It combined the incidence of the topics innovation and marketing of services within this very particular industry. The methodology used for this article was through a systematic review that focused particularly on the study and analysis of the literature through a bibliometric study where it was possible to include research carried out at an empirical and retrospective level. These articles were extracted from the LENS.ORG database. It concludes by stating that it is essential to understand the processes related to innovation, transforming ideas into facts, and facts into market positioning. Innovating is being able to visualize all those situations in a way to do things faster, cheaper and easier; while the marketing study presented strategic frameworks in the continuous search for both the service offered, as well as the satisfaction perceived by customers.

 

 

This study identifies the presence, productivity and influence of Ibero-American authors that write about information literacy (InfoLit). Using bibliometric and altmetric indicators, it seeks to analyze the impact and subsequent use of their scholarly works on social and scientific platforms. Fifty-five authors with the highest productivity were identified, based on the results of bibliometric studies on InfoLit carried out on both an international and Ibero-American scale in searches of major databases as well as publications collected in a Latin American wiki. Subsequently an analysis of bibliometric and altmetric indicators at the author and publication level was carried out, based on the results of searches on eight scientific platforms (Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Academia. edu, Mendeley, ORCID, IraLIS, E-LIS and EXIT), three social networks (Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn), and data provided by a commercial supplier (Altmetric. com). Overall we found a greater presence of authors in ResearchGate (58%), Academia. edu (51%) and Google Scholar (49%) as opposed to Mendeley (25%) and ORCID (18%). Furthermore, as to social platforms, the greatest potential influence lies with Facebook, due to its high number of followers (/top 10 authors). In addition, an analysis with the Spearman rho statistic, shows among some sources and platforms, a low correlation between the number of citations in Google Scholar and readings in Mendeley (r = 382) and low negative for mentions in blogs (r = 0,-237), Google+ (r = 0, -214) and Twitter (r = 0, -183). In conclusion, both the productivity and the impact-visibility center on specific authors writing about InfoLit, and various measurement resources show that for these authors there is a positive two-way impact from bibliometric to altmetric and vice versa.

 

 

The scientific production of Mexico registered in Web of Science from 1900-2000 in the areas of Exact Sciences and Engineering is analyzed to describe the way in which female researchers are integrated in the development of these fields of study. The paper employs a quantitative bibliometric method, applying indicators of gender, scientific output and impact, and analysis of bibliometric networks of co-authorship. In Mexico, researchers in exact sciences and engineering published their first papers in the first half of the 20th century, but female researchers working in Syntex laboratories did not publish until the 1940s. As more women joined faculties in higher education and research centers in the 60s and 70s, publication by female researchers began to increase accordingly. This growth also appears to be associated with changes in career choice by women. While the contributions of this work represent an advantage for the scientific community itself, they also are useful for organizations that promote gender equity and institutions that integrate female researchers in this field of study.

 

 

This study aimed to analyze the 100 most-cited articles on intraoral squamous cell carcinoma and its risk factors. A literature search was conducted on November 12, 2020 using the Web of Science database. Bibliometric data were collected after study selection. Bibliometric maps were generated using VOSviewer software. Articles were ranked based on the number of citations, ranging from 108 to 1513 per study. Eleven studies presented at least 400 citations. Articles were published between 1950 and 2017 and were mostly case-control studies (n = 39) and narrative reviews (n = 29). The author and institution in most articles were S. Franceschi (n = 10) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (n = 10), respectively. The most prominent countries were the United States (n = 35), the United Kingdom (n = 16), and France (n = 9). Among the 100 most-cited articles, only one article was from Brazil, and the authors were affiliated with the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research. Bibliometric maps showed strong associations between the terms alcohol, smoked/smokeless tobacco, and human papillomavirus. Emerging terms, such as areca nut and betel quid, were cited in recent articles. In conclusion, alcohol, tobacco, and human papillomavirus were the most prominent risk factors. Case-control design was the most common study design, and the majority of studies were conducted in the United States by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.