Producción Científica

The objective of this article was analyzed as it configures the field of publications on public sphere. The research was developed as a bibliometric study through the Web of Science database. In summary, the study shows that the field of publications in the public sphere is interdisciplinary, broad and still growing, especially since the 1990s. It was found that besides the author of the most cited article, the philosopher Jurgen Habermas appears as a main bibliographical reference of the field, even with a diversity of criticisms. As relevant on the intellectual basis still appears Fraser (1992) and Calhoun (1992). The results of this work may guide and support new theoretical discussions and empirical researches, including those on economic, social and political processes in Brazilian courses – and contribute to the research fields of public administration and social management.

Flourishing at work has been shown to be a promising field for research, as it is linked to the individual’s notions of well-being. Florescer refers to the understanding that individuals at work enjoy the good life, reach their full development and have greater perceptions of quality of life. Therefore, the aim of this research is to analyze the current panorama of international scientific production on flourishing at work, proposing a research agenda. From a combination of a systematic literature review with a bibliometric analysis, 42 articles were found that deal with the individual flourishing in the work environment. The analyzes were divided into bibliometric indicators and content indicators, showing an evolution of the field from 2005 onwards and three clusters of research traditions were found: flourishing and dimensions of well-being, well-being and engagement at work. In addition, research gaps were identified, which allowed the design of an agenda. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

This article presents an analysis of the journal HISTORIA Y MEMORIA as a means of communication and scientific publication in the area of social history, it’s development and its insertion in the academic community in this field. The starting point is a reflection on the editorial trajectory in the field of social history in which memory is a substantial referent of analysis for historians because it allows for the understanding other problems, other actors, other scenarios, and, above all, other sources; all this, in order to understand the voices of the invisible, the marginalised and other groups that have remained anonymous. This reflection is based on a bibliometric analysis in which themes, authors, as well as the connection and origin of the authors is evaluated, until the point of understanding how the journal, in its 9 years of existence, has managed to position itself in the field of historical knowledge in Colombia and in an international context.