Producción Científica

 

 

Background: Seasonal influenza and novel H1N1 influenza from 2009 present worldwide difficulties for public health sectors. It is difficult to distinguish between significant research output due to the rising quantity of papers mentioning this infectious disease. We aimed to identify a scientometric analysis of influenza diseases. We aimed to highlight the progress made in the discipline by the researchers affiliated with most documents. Methods: The h-index was used to evaluate the publication performance of highly cited papers. We retrieved the scientometric data using the keywords “Influenza” OR “Flu” OR “Orthomyxoviridae” AND “Antiviral agents” OR “Antiviral drugs.” In all, 59013 documents were retrieved from the Web of Science between 2011 and 2020. The exported data to Biblioshiny and Microsoft Excel tools included sources by year, active authors, active journals, and countries. Also, we made use of quantitative analysis with scientometric indicators and knowledge mapping through the VOSviewer visualization software for creating the network visualization maps. Results: We found most papers written in English and other languages were from 402027 authors and listed in 4443 core journals. The researchers found that Palese P produced 155 and received an h-index of 55. The author Li Y has the highest contributions, with 313 publications. In global influenza research, Europe and North America are the most productive and impactful continents. The influenza research has been published in very few journals. Conclusion: This study will help hospital librarians and other library professionals to understand the status of research on influenza at any given point in time.

 

 

Bibliographic databases are vital tools for researchers and scholars.For those in the engineering disciplines, three databases, Compendex, Inspec, and Web of Science, are among the most important.These three databases offer journals covering a wide range of STEM, and specifically engineering topics.Because each database is a paid subscription service, and because they each focus more on some subject areas than others, this work aimed to interrogate the overlap and differences in journal coverage and subject areas so that users may be informed on which database would be most beneficial for them.This analysis includes examining how many journals appear in multiple databases vs. how many journals are unique to a single database and what keywords are most prevalent in each database.Additionally, the diversity of subjects present in each database was determined.Analysis was performed using specialized macros developed in Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) for Excel.These macros unified journals and keyword formatting so that the coverage lists from each database could be accurately compared.

 

 

The development of appropriate statistical models has lagged behind the ambitions of empirical studies analysing large scientific networks—systems of publications connected by citations and authorship. Extant research typically focuses on either paper citation networks or author collaboration networks. However, these networks involve both direct relationships, as well as broader dependencies between references linked by multiple citation paths. In this work, we extend recently developed relational hyperevent models to analyse networks characterized by complex dependencies across multiple network modes. We introduce new covariates to represent theoretically relevant and empirically plausible mixed-mode network configurations. This model specification allows testing hypotheses that recognize the polyadic nature of publication data, while accounting for multiple dependencies linking authors and references of current and prior papers. We implement the model using open-source software to analyse publicly available data on a large scientific network. Our findings reveal a tendency for subsets of papers to be cocited, indicating that the impact of these papers may be partly due to endogenous network processes. More broadly, the analysis shows that models accounting for both the hyperedge structure of publication events and the interconnections between authors and references significantly enhance our understanding of the mechanisms driving scientific production and impact.

 

 

A standard approach to compare research collaborations between pairs of countries is to look at the citations accrued by all publications with authors from both countries. This approach is often misleading, as aspects only marginally related to the collaboration between the country pairs may bias the result considerably. Among them, the main aspect is the number of co-authors. Publications with many co-authors have on average higher citation impact. If the mix of co-publications between two countries has a high share of such publications, the citation impact will likely be high. Moreover, publications with many co-authors tend to include many countries and are thus only to a limited extent characterising the actual collaboration between the selected pair of countries. The purpose of this study is to develop methods for comparisons of country pairs useful for policy makers, who use SciVal or similar tools. Five methods to compare international collaboration are developed and tested. It is noted that the standard approach for comparisons deviates the most. Fractional methods to calculate the citation impact are recommended, as they allow for the use of citations to all co-publications with a higher weight on the citations to publications in which the country pair dominates. As fractionalisation is laborious to carry out based on SciVal data, a more convenient option is also suggested, which is to use co-publications with maximum 10 co-authors. Elsevier should introduce better methods for comparisons of international collaborations and, until this has been made, help its users understand the limitations of the standard approach featured in SciVal. A by-product of the study is that international co-publications deliver a higher citation impact also when publications with the same number of co-authors are compared.

 

 

The Journal of Risk Research is a leading international journal in risk research connected to multidisciplinary areas. It was launched in 1998 and founded by Ragnar E. Löfstedt. Motivated by its 25th anniversary in 2023, this paper presents a general bibliometric overview of the leading trends occurring in the journal between 1998 and 2023. The study aims to identify the journal’s impact, the most productive and influential authors, institutions, countries/territories, leading topics, and to analyse their evolution through time. The work mainly uses the Scopus database to analyse the bibliometric data. But in some particular cases, the Web of Science Core Collection database is also used to supplement bibliographic information. Moreover, we develop a graphical mapping of the bibliographic material by applying the Visualisation of Similarities (VOS) viewer software to provide deeper analyses. The graphical visualisation uses co-citation, bibliographic coupling, and co-occurrence of author keywords. The results emphasise the significant growth and impact of the journal throughout its entire lifetime. It is expected that the journal will continue growing its international diversity and disseminating knowledge in risk research all over the world.

 

 

Introduction: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has experienced considerable growth, addressing the challenges of obesity and its complications. The lack of a comprehensive bibliometric analysis in Latin America motivates this study, highlighting the need to understand the evolution of research in this area and its impact on clinical decision-making and health policies. Methodology: A cross-sectional bibliometric study was carried out using the Scopus database. A structured search strategy was designed to identify articles related to bariatric surgery with authors affiliated with Latin American countries. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, followed by a descriptive and bibliometric analysis of the scientific production found. Results: A total of 3553 documents published between 1991 and 2024 were included. There was an annual growth of 11%, with an average age of documents of 7.5 years. A concentration was observed in some countries, notably Brazil, Mexico, and Chile. Although scientific output increased, the average number of citations per article showed a downward trend since 2003. Discussion: Despite the growth in scientific production, the quality and relevance of research is questioned, especially given the decrease in the impact received. It highlights the lack of meaningful regional collaboration, which could limit the sharing of knowledge and resources. Questions are raised about gaps in research capacity and the economic and development implications are discussed. Conclusions: This study provides valuable information to strengthen future research in bariatric surgery in Latin America. It highlights the importance of promoting regional and international collaboration and improving research training in countries with less participation. Clinical intervention strategies can benefit from better understanding research trends and adopting evidence-based practices in a more informed manner.

 

 

The article presents the results of an information review of special libraries of higher education institutions, members of the network of educational libraries of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine and the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine regarding the use of bibliometric methods in their activities and the provision of bibliometric services presented on the library websites. A sample of fourteen special libraries of higher education institutions of Ukraine, which were included in the webometric ranking of the world’s universities in the version of Webometrics Ranking of World’s Universities January 2024, was formed. Quantitative monitoring of the sites of special libraries was carried out according to the following parameters of information services using bibliometric methods: bibliographic, organizational, methodical, scientific and information services. The content and thematic load was established for the main areas of information services and methods used in the work of libraries: organization of access to bibliographic and scientometric databases by means of citation and citation management; creation and adjustment of ORCID author profiles, development of methodological recommendations for their filling; organization of bibliometric data search on the topic of scientific research in the institutional repository; development of recommendations regarding the use of bibliometric resources and bibliometric indicators. It was established that the use of bibliometric services is expanding and deepening in the conditions of the progress of European integration of education and pedagogical science of Ukraine. Prospects for further scientific research in the researched direction are predicted.

 

 

El objetivo general de la investigación fue determinar las dimensiones e indicadores para el diagnóstico de la calidad de las universidades. La investigación se desarrolló desde el paradigma positivista y desde la perspectiva cuantitativa, mediante la búsqueda, recolección y análisis crítico documental, referencial bibliográfico, en este sentido, desde un diseño bibliográfico de tipo documental. Lo analítico–sintético, se fundamentó en descomponer mentalmente el sistema estudiado en varios compendios para poder llegar a la producción de nuevo conocimiento. Se recurrió, al método inductivo-deductivo. Se concluye que, las universidades están adoptando diversas tendencias en la gestión de la calidad para asegurar la excelencia educativa y la satisfacción de los estudiantes. Entre estas tendencias se incluyen la implementación de sistemas de gestión de la calidad basados en normativas internacionales, el enfoque hacia la mejora continua mediante retroalimentación constante y la participación de toda la comunidad universitaria en procesos de evaluación y aseguramiento.

 

 

Background and Objectives: Citation analysis is a fundamental method in bibliometrics for quantifying the impact and contribution of articles on a specific biomedical field. The purpose of our study was to identify and analyze the top 100 cited articles in the field of EUS. Methods: All published articles in the field of EUS were searched by using “endoscopic ultrasound” and its synonyms as the search terms without time limit. The Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science Core database was searched to determine the citations. The top 100 cited articles were identified and further evaluated for characteristics including publication year, authors, journals, impact factor, countries, institutions, article type, topic term, and evidence grade, among others. Results: A total of 430 articles were cited more than 100 times. The 100 most-cited articles were published between 1988 and 2018, and the medium citation was 240.5 (104.25). The top 100 cited articles mainly focused on diagnostic performance (80%) and interventional therapy (20%). The numbers of articles studying the diagnostic accuracy of FNA (n = 29) and tumor diagnosis (n = 29) were the highest among research articles on FNA and EUS of diagnostic categories, and EUS transluminal drainage (n = 14) was the most frequently used EUS technique for therapy. The focus of the majority of the articles was on diseases of pancreas (n = 55), and among the 55 articles related to pancreatic diseases, pancreatic cancer (n = 17) and solid pancreatic masses (n = 13) were the most researched topics. In addition, we found that the proportions of diagnostic and treatment-related articles at different time periods have statistical significance (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Our analysis provides an insight into the top 100 articles in the field of EUS, revealing EUS-guided FNA, tumor staging, and transluminal drainage as the major advances in the past 35 years. Pancreatic diseases were the most researched, especially pancreatic cancer or solid pancreatic masses. Our research has found that the number of articles on the application of EUS treatment has significantly increased.

 

 

An infection that can occur in any part of the urinary system is known as a urinary tract infection (UTI). The urinary system comprises the bladder, urethra, ureters, and kidneys. The majority of infections affect the lower urinary system’s bladder and urethra. This study presents a scientometric analysis of authorship patterns in Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and Diabetes. The study focuses on Lotka’s law to understand the productivity and impact of authors in the field. For this study, 1149 documents were retrieved from the Web of Science database from 2009 to 2023. The USA leads in publications on UTIs and diabetes among all countries. Among all authors, Kuku K has been the most productive author. K-S test reveals that the current data set does not support Lotka’s law’s applicability to research on urinary tract infections and diabetes. The findings of the study suggest that there is a need for more research to be done to improve the understanding of the relationship between UTI and Diabetes.