Artículo

Legal research in question: A systematic review study

Resumen

This paper intends to check in what extent the articles published in the legal area journals have and make explicit methodological criteria recommended by the ABNT (Associaçao Brasileira de Normas Técnicas). We used an descriptive and exploratory study and bibliometric systematic review approach. We found that from the 241 published papers in legal paper journals, 37% of them do not presente the objective in the review, 61% do not make explicit the method and/or the methodology used to develop the research; and, at last, 61% do not presente the result and/or the conclusion. If, on the one hand, the recurring absence of these founding elements of research, in any area, tends to weaken and project itself as an obstacle to legal publications with scientific intentions, on the other, it makes visible the need for refinement of research in the legal area.
Maciel-Lima, Sandra (8272392400); de Souza-Lima, José Edmilson (57223094363); Motta, Jefferson Holliver (57223098578); Anderson, João Paulo Jamnik (57223083327); Ryndack, Jaqueline Maria (57223098781); Gouveia, Yumi Sagawa (57223098787); Mendes, Camila Capucho Cury (57223097478)
2021
10.19092/REED.V8I.560
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85104818206&doi=10.19092%2fREED.V8I.560&partnerID=40&md5=ac34d9734a32b93da5ec933906ed29dd
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
Scopus
Artículo obtenido de:
Scopus
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo
Subscribirse
Notificación de