Artículo

Co-authorship networks and research impact in large research facilities: benchmarking internal reports and bibliometric databases

Resumen

In this paper, we address the main differences of the scientific production between internal and external researcher groups of a synchrotron radiation facility. Through the construction and analysis of their co-authorship networks, we could see the structural variations in the way these two different kinds of research groups collaborate. We also evaluated the scientific impact of each group and found surprising similarities, which led us to create two hypotheses that might contribute to the comprehension of the scientific assessment of large-scale research facilities. We found that, as the review criteria the studied synchrotron adopts to select external scientific projects is very effective; the quality of the external research is at least as good as the internal. Therefore, evaluating the internal scientific output appears to be an appropriate representation of the impact of the whole laboratory.
Autores
Kohler, AF; Digiampietri, LA
Título
Classification of authors, institutions, and countries, using productivity, centrality, and impact metrics: The field of tourism studies in Brazil (journals), 1990-2018
Afiliaciones
Universidade de Sao Paulo
Año
2021
DOI
10.7784/rbtur.v15i3.2035
Tipo de acceso abierto
Green Published, gold
Referencia
WOS:000891850400004
Artículo obtenido de:
WOS
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo