Artículo
A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Latin America and the Caribbean
Resumen
","
"Authors","Author full names","Author(s) ID","Titles","Year","Source title","Volume","Issue","Art. No.","Page start","Page end","Page count","DOI","Cited by","Link","Affiliations","Authors with affiliations","Abstract","Indexed Keywords","Author Keywords","Molecular Sequence Numbers","Chemicals/CAS","Funding Details","Funding Texts","References","Correspondence Address","Editors","Tradenames","Manufacturers","Publisher","Conference name","Conference code","Conference location","Conference date","Sponsors","ISSN","ISBN","CODEN","PubMed ID","Language of Original Document","Abbreviated Source Title","Document Type","Publication Stage","Open Access","Source","EID"
"Espinosa I.; Cuenca V.; Eissa-Garcés A.; Sisa I.","Espinosa, Isabel (57222222005); Cuenca, Víctor (57329081100); Eissa-Garcés, Ahmed (57224992729); Sisa, Ivan (54421256700)","57222222005; 57329081100; 57224992729; 54421256700","A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Latin America and the Caribbean; [Un análisis bibliométrico de la investigación sobre COVID-19 en Latinoamérica y el Caribe]","2021","Revista Facultad de Medicina","69","3","e94520","","","","10.15446/revfacmed.v69n3.94520","4","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85117072944&doi=10.15446%2frevfacmed.v69n3.94520&partnerID=40&md5=214c9c0d0fd00cfa0b91ac4d3e82a67c","Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, College of Health Sciences, Medical School, Quito, Ecuador","Espinosa I., Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, College of Health Sciences, Medical School, Quito, Ecuador; Cuenca V., Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, College of Health Sciences, Medical School, Quito, Ecuador; Eissa-Garcés A., Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, College of Health Sciences, Medical School, Quito, Ecuador; Sisa I., Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, College of Health Sciences, Medical School, Quito, Ecuador","Introduction: Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is one of the regions most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, there is scarce literature addressing the research strategies developed in LAC to face COVID-19. Objective: To quantify and assess the production of scientific publications about COVID-19 in 32 countries of LAC between January 1 and July 31, 2020. Materials and methods: Bibliometric study. Scientific papers on COVID-19 conducted in LAC or re-porting data pertaining to LAC and published between January 1 to July 31, 2020, were searched in the Scopus, PubMed, and LILACS databases. A subgroup analysis including only original research articles was performed to determine the contribution of LAC countries to research on COVID-19, and standardization measures (# of articles per million people) were applied to compare the country-spe-cific production of this type of articles. Results: A total of 1 291 publications were retrieved. Overall, most of them were non-original research articles (81.72%), and the countries with the highest scientific production were Brazil (43.91%) and Mexico (9.14%). However, after applying the standardization measures, Chile was the country with the highest production of original articles (0.58 per million inhabitants). Regarding original studies (n=236), cross-sectional design was the most common (25.84%). Diagnosis and treatment of the disease was the main research focus (n=354; 27.42%). However, in the subgroup analysis (n=236), epidemiology and surveillance were the most prevalent research focus (n=57; 24.15%). Conclusions: During the study period, non-original research articles were predominant in the scientific production of the LAC region, and interventional studies were scarce among original articles, while the cross-sectional design predominated. Further research with a better quality of evidence should be performed in these countries to contribute to the making of health policies aimed at easing the burden of COVID-19 in the region and preparing for future pandemics. © 2021, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. All rights reserved.","","Bibliometrics; Biomedical Research; Caribbean Region (MeSH); COVID-19; Latin America","","","","","Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(1):157-60. https://doi.org/ggq86h.; Wold Health Organization (WHO). WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. New York: Who; 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3DhSOY5.; Gianola S, Jesus TS, Bargeri S, Castellini G. Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240123. https://doi.org/ghgdxw.; Brainard J. Scientists are drowning in COVID-19 papers. Can new tools keep them afloat? Science. 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 14]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3gAEksC.; Viglione G. How scientific conferences will survive the coronavirus shock. Nature. 2020;582(7811):166-7. https://doi.org/gsrv.; Kun Á. Time to acceptance of 3 days for papers about COVID-19. Publications. 2020;8(2):30. https://doi.org/gg924h.; Durieux V, Gevenois PA. Bibliometric indicators: quality measure-ments of scientific publication. Radiology. 2010;255(2):342-51. https://doi.org/d8b2vn.; Ortiz AP, Calo WA, Suárez-Balseiro C, Maura-Sardo M, Suárez E. Bibliometric assessment of cancer research in Puerto Rico, 1903-2005. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2009;25(4):353-61. https://doi.org/fswzv8.; Hamidah I, Sriyono S, Hudha MN. A Bibliometric Analysis of Covid-19 Research using VOSviewer. Indones J Sci Technol. 2020;5(2):209-16. https://doi.org/gmbncm.; Fan J, Gao Y, Zhao N, Dai R, Zhang H, Feng X, et al. Biblio-metric analysis on COVID-19: A comparison of research between English and Chinese studies. Front Public Health. 2020;8:477. https://doi.org/gjpthh.; Reeves P, Kahn C. Latin America becomes A new epicenter of the Coronavirus pandemic. NPR. 2020 Jun 3 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://n.pr/38eWf3p.; Forero-Peña DA, Carrión-Nessi FS, Camejo-Ávila NA, Forero-Peña MJ. COVID-19 en Latinoamérica: una revisión sistemática de la literatura y análisis bibliométrico. Rev. salud publica. 2020;22(2):1-7. https://doi.org/gsrz.; Fiesco-Sepúlveda KY, Serrano-Bermúdez LM. Contribu-tions of Latin American researchers in the understanding of the novel coronavirus outbreak: a literature review. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9332. https://doi.org/gk7f4z.; Gregorio-Chaviano O, Limaymanta CH, López-Mesa EK. Análi-sis bibliométrico de la producción científica latinoamericana sobre COVID-19. Biomedica. 2020;40(Suppl 2):104-15. https://doi.org/fmvw.; World Health Organization (WHO). Countries. New York: WHO; 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 20]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2WnMpdg.; Worldometer. Latin America and the Caribbean Population. Worldometer; 2021 [cited 2021 Feb 15]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3BggD0y.; Pérez-Ortega R. ‘We’re losing an entire generation of sci-entists.’ COVID-19’s economic toll hits Latin America hard. Science. 2020 Aug 12 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3gCJVi6.; Rueda A. Pese a crisis, Latinoamérica financia investigación en COVID-19. Scidev.net. 2020 Jul 13 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3sORO8U.; Greer SL, King EJ, da Fonseca EM, Peralta-Santos A. The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses. Glob Public Health. 2020;15(9):1413-6. https://doi.org/ghc7p6.; Liu W, Hu G, Gu M. The probability of publishing in first-quar-tile journals. Scientometrics. 2016;106(3):1273-6. https://doi.org/f8ktds.; Gallegos M, Cervigni M, Consoli AJ, Caycho-Rodríguez T, Polanco FA, Martino P, et al. COVID-19 in Latin America: A bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in health. Elec-tron J Gen Med. 2020;17(6):em261. https://doi.org/gsv2.; Wang P, Tian D. Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19. J Biosaf Biosecur. 2021;3(1):4-9. https://doi.org/gsv3.; Didegah F, Thelwall M. Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties. J Informetr. 2013;7(4):861-73. https://doi.org/f5jbpm.; Rahman MM, Ghoshal UC, Ragunath K, Jenkins G, Rahman M, Edwards C, et al. Biomedical research in developing countries: Opportunities, methods, and challenges. Indian J Gastroen-terol. 2020;39(3):292-302. https://doi.org/gh7294.; Guleid FH, Oyando R, Kabia E, Mumbi A, Akech S, Barasa E. A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(5):e005690. https://doi.org/gmb22q.; National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Board on Global Health, Committee on Clinical Trials During the 2014-2015 Ebola Outbreak. Integrating clinical research into epidemic response: The Ebola experience. Mancher M, Cuff P, Keusch G, editors. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press; 2017. https://doi.org/gsv4.; Rabaan AA, Al-Ahmed SH, Bazzi AM, Al-Tawfiq JA. Dynamics of scientific publications on the MERS-CoV outbreaks in Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. 2017;10(6):702-10. https://doi.org/gsv6.; COVID-19 is here. Now How Long Will It Last? New Haven: Yale School of Medicine; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2WuIzPq.; Malamud C, Núñez R. El COVID-19 en América Latina: desafíos políticos, retos para los sistemas sanitarios e incertidumbre económica. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3ktTmkW.; Coronel E, Halstead D, Fregni F. Clinical research in Latin America: obstacles and opportunities. Clin Investig. 2011;1(7):911-3. https://doi.org/cf7txr.; Sisa I, Abad A, Espinosa I, Martinez-Cornejo I, Burba-no-Santos P. A decade of Ecuador´s efforts to raise its health research output: a bibliometric analysis. Glob Health Action. 2021;14(1):1855694. https://doi.org/gsv9.; Smyth AR, Rawlinson C, Jenkins G. Preprint servers: a “rush to publish” or “just in time delivery” for science? Thorax. 2020;75(7):532-3. https://doi.org/gg9242.; Mingers J, Leydesdorff L. A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. Eur J Oper Res. 2015;246(1):1-19. https://doi.org/gcpndb.; Gasparyan AY. Bibliographic databases: some critical points. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(6):799-800. https://doi.org/gswc.; AlRyalat SAS, Malkawi LW, Momani SM. Comparing bibliometric analysis using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databas-es. J Vis Exp. 2019;(152):e58494. https://doi.org/ghph9g.","I. Sisa; Escuela de Medicina, Colegio de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador; email: isisa@usfq.edu.ec","","","","Universidad Nacional de Colombia","","","","","","01200011","","","","English","Rev. Fac. Med.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85117072944"
Autores | Espinosa, Isabel (57222222005); Cuenca, Víctor (57329081100); Eissa-Garcés, Ahmed (57224992729); Sisa, Ivan (54421256700) |
Año | 2021 |
DOI | 10.15446/revfacmed.v69n3.94520 |
Fuente | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85117072944&doi=10.15446%2frevfacmed.v69n3.94520&partnerID=40&md5=214c9c0d0fd00cfa0b91ac4d3e82a67c |
Afiliaciones | Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, College of Health Sciences, Medical School, Quito, Ecuador |
Tipo de acceso abierto | All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access |
Referencia | Scopus |
Artículo obtenido de: | Scopus |