","

"Authors","Author full names","Author(s) ID","Titles","Year","Source title","Volume","Issue","Art. No.","Page start","Page end","Page count","DOI","Cited by","Link","Affiliations","Authors with affiliations","Abstract","Indexed Keywords","Author Keywords","Molecular Sequence Numbers","Chemicals/CAS","Funding Details","Funding Texts","References","Correspondence Address","Editors","Tradenames","Manufacturers","Publisher","Conference name","Conference code","Conference location","Conference date","Sponsors","ISSN","ISBN","CODEN","PubMed ID","Language of Original Document","Abbreviated Source Title","Document Type","Publication Stage","Open Access","Source","EID" "Espinoza-Torres D.; Segarra-Oña M.","Espinoza-Torres, Diana (57202941374); Segarra-Oña, Marival (36024367900)","57202941374; 36024367900","Disentangling the relationship between prior knowledge and entrepreneurial orientation: a bibliometric study; [Comprendiendo la relación entre conocimientos previos y orientación emprendedora: un estudio bibliométrico]","2022","Tec Empresarial","16","2","","1","17","16","10.18845/te.v16i2.6167","0","https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85141132279&doi=10.18845%2fte.v16i2.6167&partnerID=40&md5=8da4be613f10fa7b89f9a0012b1b82cb","Departamento de Ciencias Empresariales, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador; Ecuador & Management PhD Program, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Spain; Management Department, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain","Espinoza-Torres D., Departamento de Ciencias Empresariales, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador, Ecuador & Management PhD Program, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Spain; Segarra-Oña M., Management Department, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain","This paper analyzes the theoretical relationship between knowledge and entrepreneurship through a bibliometric study. Several indicators are drawn from the Web of Science database using the HistCite software for bibliometrics, including annual publications, citation density, and journals with the highest number of publications. For the empirical application, a qualitative approach was adopted through a case study of four companies located in Valencia with the application of a semi-structured interview. The Atlas.ti software was used to analyze the data. The results indicate a relationship between knowledge and entrepreneurship constructs through theoretical modeling, highlighting the importance of the origin of knowledge for new venture creation, knowledge commercialization processes through entrepreneurship opportunities, and the origin and transmission of knowledge in organizations with entrepreneurial orientation (EO). The main limitation is the dispersion of research topics and the exclusion of publications that did not address the investigated relationship directly. The theoretical model proposed in this study can be extended to different spheres to identify and generate entrepreneurship opportunities, especially in universities and incumbent firms. Future studies should further validate the model empirically. © 2022 Business School, Instituto Tecnologico de Costa Rica. All Rights Reserved.","","bibliometrics; business opportunity; entrepreneurial orientation; entrepreneurship; Knowledge","","","","","Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. (2003). Handbook of entrepreneurship research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b105789; Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. (2010). Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1191-9; Acs Z. J., Audretsch D. B., Braunerhjelm P., & Carlsson B. (2004). The Missing Link: The Knowledge Filter and Entrepreneurship in Endogenous Growth. Centre for Economic Policy Research.; Acs Z. J., Braunerhjelm P., Audretsch D. B., & Carlsson B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3; Agarwal R., Audretsch D., & Sarkar M. (2007). The process of creative construction: Knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship, and economy growt. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1), 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.36; Agarwal, R., & Shah, S. K. (2014). Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators. Research Policy, 43(7), 1109-1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.012; Allee, V. (1997). The knowledge evolution. Expanding organizational intelligence. Butterworth-Heinemann.; Alvarez S., Barney J., & You S. (2010). Debates in entrepreneurship: Opportunity formation and implications for the field of entrepreneurship. In: Acs, Z. and Audretsch, D. (Ed.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction (pp. 23-45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1191-9; Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609 - 626). Princeton University Press. http://www.nber.org/books/univ62-1; Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1242-1254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00722.x; Audretsch D. B., Keilbach M., & Lehmann E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183511.001.0001; Barrio, I., González, J., Padín, L., Peral, P., Sánchez, I., & Tarín, E. (2016). El estudio de casos. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.; Braunerhjelm P., Acs Z. J., Audretsch D. B., & Carlsson B. (2010). The missing link: Knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economics, 34(2), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9235-1; Brinkley, I. (2006). Defining the knowledge economy. The Work Foundation.; Burton M. D., Sorensen J., & Beckman C. M. (2002). Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. In Lounsbury, M. and Ventresca, M. J. (Ed.), Social Structure and Organizations Revisited (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 19) (pp. 229-262). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-558X(02)19007-0; Cancino C., Merigó J., Urbano D., & Amorós J.E. (2020). Evolution of the entrepreneurship and innovation research in Ibero-America between 1986 and 2015. Journal of Small Business management, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1776578; Cardona R., Martins I., & Velásquez H. (2017). Entrepreneurial orientation, assessment and management of projects and impact in corporate entrepreneurship: Intention to action. Cuadernos de Gestión, 17(2), 37-62.; Carlsson B., Acs Z. J., Audretsch D. B., & Braunerhjelm P. (2009). Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: A historical review. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1193-1229. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp043; Carroll G., Bigelow L., Seidel M. D., & Tsai L. (1996). The fates of de novo and de alio producers in the american automobile industry 1885-1981. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 117–137. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486907; Casson, M. (1982). The entrepreneur: An economic theory. Barnes & Noble Books.; Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innvation. Administrative Science Technology, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553; Covin, J. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(5), 855-872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00482.x; Covin, J., & Slevin, D. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107; Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x; De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapan, N. T. (2013). Organizational social capital, formalization, and internal knowledge sharing in entrepreneurial orientation formation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 505-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12021; Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entepreneurship: Practice and principles. Harper Collins.; Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/258557; Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 154-177. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791608; Ganco, M. (2013). Cutting the gordian knot: The effect of knowledge complexity on employee mobility and entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 34(6), 666-686. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2044; Garfield, E. (2003). Using histcite to map the output of small world, Watson-Crick 1953, cell death and differentiation. University of Leicester.; Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.; González-Valiente, C. L. (2016). Investigación sobre bibliotecología, ciencia de la información e inteligencia empresarial a través de las presentaciones a los congresos INFO e IntEmpres: Un análisis bibliométrico (2002-2012). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 39(4), e154. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2016.4.1377; Hayek, F. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519-530.; Helfat, C. E., & Lieberman, M. (2002). The birth of capabilities market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 725-760. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.4.725; Huamaní, G. A. Z., López, S. F., Gómez, I. N., de Pablo López, I., & de León, J. D. N. S. (2018). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Informe GEM España 2017-2018 (Vol. 240). Universidad de Cantabria.; Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An austrian approach. Journal of Economic literature, 35(1), 60-85. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2729693; Klepper, S., & Simons, K. L. (2000). Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive in the U.S. television receiver industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 997-1016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3094424; Landström H., Harirchi G., & Åström F. (2012). Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1154-1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.009; Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136; Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632; Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1995). Designing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.; Mašić, B., Nešić, S., Nikolić, D., & Dželetović, M. (2017). Evolution of knowledge management. Industrija, 45(2), 127-147.; Medina-López C., Marín-García J. A., & Alfalla-Luque R. (2010). Una propuesta metodológica para la realización de búsquedas sistemáticas de bibliografía. Working Papers on Operations Management, 1(2), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v1i2.786; Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1978). Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science, 24(9), 921-933. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2630632; Mises, L. (1949). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Yale University Press; Mosinska, S. (2013). The role of knowledge in the process of technology entrepreneurship development. In Matejun, M. and Walecka, A. (Ed.), Modern entrepreneurship in business practice: Selected issues (pp.18-29). Lodz University of Technology Press. https://yourshort.link/DNBbN; Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university - industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy, 35(10), 1499-1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.023; Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373; Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2635068; Oliveira, M. L., Santos, J. L., Becker, G. V., & Hansen, P. B. (2016). Uma análise bibliométrica da literatura internacional sobre colaboração na cadeia de suprimentos. Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, 13(1), 32-52.; Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. The University of Chicago Press.; Ponce-Espinosa, G., Segarra-Oña, M., & Peiró-Signes, Á. (2020a). De la capacidad de absorción a la generación de conocimiento en la empresa: Identificación de aspectos clave. Tec Empresarial, 14(3), 34-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.18845/te.v14i3.5361; Ponce-Espinosa, G., Peiro-Signes, A., & Segarra-Oña, M. (2022, In press). Absorptive capacity and in-company routines: Modelling knowledge creation in the tourism industry. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1796544; Prieto, I., & Revilla, E. (2004). La naturaleza dual de la gestión del conocimiento: Implicaciones para la capacidad de aprendizaje y los resultados organizativos. Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 32, 47-75.; Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71- S102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937632; Rodríguez, C., Lorenzo, O., & Herrera, L. (2005). Teoría y práctica del análisis de datos cualitativos. Proceso general y criterios de calidad. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 133-154.; San Martín, D. (2014). Teoría fundamentada y Atlas.ti: recursos metodológicos para la investigación educativa. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 16(1), 104-122.; Sarabia, F. (1999). Metodología para la investigación en marketing y dirección de empresas. Pirámide, S.A.; Say, J. B. (1821). A treatise on political economy or the production, distribution and consumption of wealth. Augustus M. Kelley Publishers.; Serida, J., & Morales, O. (2011). Utilizando la teoría del comportamiento planeado para predecir el emprendimiento naciente. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 46, 55-71. https://yourshort.link/DX0nG; Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2640414; Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154-170. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.154.14280; Shaw, E. (1999). A guide to the qualitative research process: Evidence from a small firm study. Qualitative Market Research, 2, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522759910269973; Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism & Democracy. Routledge; Smirnov, V. (2017). The genesis of the entrepreneurship theory at the classical and non-classical stages of science development. Economic Annals-ХХI, 164(3-4), 14-19.; Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In Katz, J. (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growt (pp.119-138). Emerald Group Publishing.; Wallace, D. P., Van Fleet, C., & Downs, L. J. (2011). The research core of the knowledge management literature. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.002; Wang, P., Zhu, F. W., Song, H. Y., Hou, J. H., & Zhang, J. L. (2018). Visualizing the academic discipline of knowledge management. Sustainability, 10(3), 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030682; Wiig, K. (1999). Knowledge management: An emerging discipline rooted in a long history. Knowledge Research Institute.; Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.360; Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.; Zimmermann R., Ferreira L. M., & Carrizo Moreira, A. (2016). The influence of supply chain on the innovation process: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management, 21(3), 289-304. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2015-0266","M. Segarra-Oña; Management Department, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; email: maseo@omp.upv.es","","","","Business School, Instituto Tecnologico de Costa Rica","","","","","","16592395","","","","English","Tec. Empres.","Article","Final","All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access","Scopus","2-s2.0-85141132279"