Artículo

A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France

Resumen

Psychosociology theories indicate that individual evaluation is integral to the recognition of professional activities. Building upon Christophe Dejours’ contributions, this recognition is influenced by two complementary judgments: the “utility” judgment from those in hierarchy and the “beauty” judgment from the peers. The aim of this paper is to elucidate how at INRAE individual assessment of scientists is conducted. This process follows a qualitative and multicriteria-based approach by peers, providing both appreciations and advice to the evaluated scientists (the “beauty” judgment). Furthermore, we expound on how INRAE regularly adapts this process to the evolving landscape of research practices, such as interdisciplinary collaboration or open science, assuring that assessments align with the current approaches of research activities.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04475-7
Combining Web of Science and Scopus datasets in citation-based literature study
2022
hybrid
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-022-04475-7.pdf
Miika Kumpulainen; Marko Seppänen
Information and Knowledge Management, Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
Artículo obtenido de:
OpenAlex
Fuente
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo
Campus Samborondón
Vía Samborondón Km. 13.5
Call Center: 5150400
metricas@ecotec.edu.ec
Facebook Instagram Youtube

Mapa del sitio