Artículo

A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France

Resumen

Psychosociology theories indicate that individual evaluation is integral to the recognition of professional activities. Building upon Christophe Dejours’ contributions, this recognition is influenced by two complementary judgments: the “utility” judgment from those in hierarchy and the “beauty” judgment from the peers. The aim of this paper is to elucidate how at INRAE individual assessment of scientists is conducted. This process follows a qualitative and multicriteria-based approach by peers, providing both appreciations and advice to the evaluated scientists (the “beauty” judgment). Furthermore, we expound on how INRAE regularly adapts this process to the evolving landscape of research practices, such as interdisciplinary collaboration or open science, assuring that assessments align with the current approaches of research activities.
Autores
Pugas, MAR; Lopes, EL; Lopes, EH; Ferreira, HL
Título
From One End to The Other: A Bibliometric Study of Publications on Omission Neglect Based on The Journals Between 1988 and 2016
Afiliaciones
Universidade Nove de Julho
Año
2020
DOI
10.23925/2178-0080.2020v22i1.44752
Tipo de acceso abierto
gold, Green Submitted
Referencia
WOS:000543784400006
Artículo obtenido de:
WOS
Fuente
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo
Campus Samborondón
Vía Samborondón Km. 13.5
Call Center: 5150400
metricas@ecotec.edu.ec
Facebook Instagram Youtube

Mapa del sitio