Artículo

A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France

Resumen

Psychosociology theories indicate that individual evaluation is integral to the recognition of professional activities. Building upon Christophe Dejours’ contributions, this recognition is influenced by two complementary judgments: the “utility” judgment from those in hierarchy and the “beauty” judgment from the peers. The aim of this paper is to elucidate how at INRAE individual assessment of scientists is conducted. This process follows a qualitative and multicriteria-based approach by peers, providing both appreciations and advice to the evaluated scientists (the “beauty” judgment). Furthermore, we expound on how INRAE regularly adapts this process to the evolving landscape of research practices, such as interdisciplinary collaboration or open science, assuring that assessments align with the current approaches of research activities.
Herrera, Claudio Díaz (57200793587); Díaz, Emilio Moyano (58418447500)
Bibliometrics and semantics in XXI century Chilean social science journals; [Bibliometría y semântica em revistas de ciências sociales chilenas del siglo XXI]
2023
10.5209/rgid.89226
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85163831993&doi=10.5209%2frgid.89226&partnerID=40&md5=bb91170f872406e2cf2e48f5dbaf538b
Universidad Católica del Maule, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Económicas, Departamento de Ciencias Sociales, Escuela de Trabajo Social, Chile; Universidad de Talca, Facultad de Psicología, Campus Talca, Chile
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
Scopus
Artículo obtenido de:
Scopus
Fuente
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo
Subscribirse
Notificación de
Campus Samborondón
Vía Samborondón Km. 13.5
Call Center: 5150400
metricas@ecotec.edu.ec
Facebook Instagram Youtube

Mapa del sitio