Artículo

A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France

Resumen

Psychosociology theories indicate that individual evaluation is integral to the recognition of professional activities. Building upon Christophe Dejours’ contributions, this recognition is influenced by two complementary judgments: the “utility” judgment from those in hierarchy and the “beauty” judgment from the peers. The aim of this paper is to elucidate how at INRAE individual assessment of scientists is conducted. This process follows a qualitative and multicriteria-based approach by peers, providing both appreciations and advice to the evaluated scientists (the “beauty” judgment). Furthermore, we expound on how INRAE regularly adapts this process to the evolving landscape of research practices, such as interdisciplinary collaboration or open science, assuring that assessments align with the current approaches of research activities.
https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.432
A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France
2024
diamond
https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.432
Denis Tagu; Françoise Boudet-Bône; Camille Brard; Edith Legouy; Frédéric Gaymard
INRAE, Direction de l’Evaluation (DEV), Unité 0837, 147 rue de l’université, 75338 Cedex 07, France; INRAE, Direction pour la Science Ouverte (DipSO), Unité 1479, 147 rue de l’université, 75338 Cedex 07, France; INRAE, Collège de Direction (CODIR), Unité 0233, 147 rue de l’université, 75338 Cedex 07, France
Artículo obtenido de:
OpenAlex
Fuente
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo
Subscribirse
Notificación de
Campus Samborondón
Vía Samborondón Km. 13.5
Call Center: 5150400
metricas@ecotec.edu.ec
Facebook Instagram Youtube

Mapa del sitio