Artículo

Academic work as craft: Towards a qualitative and multicriteria assessment

Resumen

Psychosociology theories indicate that individual evaluation is integral to the recognition of professional activities. Building upon Christophe Dejours’ contributions, this recognition is influenced by two complementary judgments: the “utility” judgment from those in hierarchy and the “beauty” judgment from the peers. The aim of this paper is to elucidate how at INRAE individual assessment of scientists is conducted. This process follows a qualitative and multicriteria-based approach by peers, providing both appreciations and advice to the evaluated scientists (the “beauty” judgment). Furthermore, we expound on how INRAE regularly adapts this process to the evolving landscape of research practices, such as interdisciplinary collaboration or open science, assuring that assessments align with the current approaches of research activities.
https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.orgstudies.100004
Academic work as craft: Towards a qualitative and multicriteria assessment
2024
hybrid
https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.orgstudies.100004
Devi Vijay; Heloise Berkowitz
Organizational Behaviour, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta – Kolkata, India; LEST, CNRS, Aix Marseille Univ – AIX EN PROVENCE CEDEX 1, France
Artículo obtenido de:
OpenAlex
Fuente
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo
Subscribirse
Notificación de
Campus Samborondón
Vía Samborondón Km. 13.5
Call Center: 5150400
metricas@ecotec.edu.ec
Facebook Instagram Youtube

Mapa del sitio