Artículo

Academic work as craft: Towards a qualitative and multicriteria assessment

Resumen

Psychosociology theories indicate that individual evaluation is integral to the recognition of professional activities. Building upon Christophe Dejours’ contributions, this recognition is influenced by two complementary judgments: the “utility” judgment from those in hierarchy and the “beauty” judgment from the peers. The aim of this paper is to elucidate how at INRAE individual assessment of scientists is conducted. This process follows a qualitative and multicriteria-based approach by peers, providing both appreciations and advice to the evaluated scientists (the “beauty” judgment). Furthermore, we expound on how INRAE regularly adapts this process to the evolving landscape of research practices, such as interdisciplinary collaboration or open science, assuring that assessments align with the current approaches of research activities.
Mariana, Christy Dwita (57222533274); Husodo, Zaäfri Ananto (35268824900); Ekaputra, Irwan Adi (55545530000); Fahlevi, Mochammad (57211888309)
The advancement of digital payment ecosystem in metaverse: A literature review
2025
10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100570
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85212562212&doi=10.1016%2fj.chbr.2024.100570&partnerID=40&md5=40dfd2ebcd825b77710e02719b74411a
Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, U.I. Campus, Depok, 16424, Indonesia; Management Department, BINUS Online, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia; Operation Research & Management Sciences, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Malaysia
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
Scopus
Artículo obtenido de:
Scopus
Fuente
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo
Subscribirse
Notificación de
Campus Samborondón
Vía Samborondón Km. 13.5
Call Center: 5150400
metricas@ecotec.edu.ec
Facebook Instagram Youtube

Mapa del sitio