Artículo

Academic work as craft: Towards a qualitative and multicriteria assessment

Resumen

Psychosociology theories indicate that individual evaluation is integral to the recognition of professional activities. Building upon Christophe Dejours’ contributions, this recognition is influenced by two complementary judgments: the “utility” judgment from those in hierarchy and the “beauty” judgment from the peers. The aim of this paper is to elucidate how at INRAE individual assessment of scientists is conducted. This process follows a qualitative and multicriteria-based approach by peers, providing both appreciations and advice to the evaluated scientists (the “beauty” judgment). Furthermore, we expound on how INRAE regularly adapts this process to the evolving landscape of research practices, such as interdisciplinary collaboration or open science, assuring that assessments align with the current approaches of research activities.
Tao, Xing (57799888900); Wang, Gang (57210467183); Wei, Wudi (57189600560); Su, Jinming (55808712700); Chen, Xiu (57216164185); Shi, Minjuan (57665868200); Liao, Yinlu (57709210200); Qin, Tongxue (57709127200); Wu, Yuting (57709168000); Lu, Beibei (57709290500); Liang, Hao (57220928681); Ye, Li (7202531493); Jiang, Junjun (47161065500)
A bibliometric analysis of m6A methylation in viral infection from 2000 to 2022
2024
10.1186/s12985-024-02294-1
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85182722171&doi=10.1186%2fs12985-024-02294-1&partnerID=40&md5=f96b721052ee4f5b23af8da48dc0bfca
Guangxi Key Laboratory of AIDS Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, Nanning, China; China (Guangxi) – ASEAN Joint Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, Nanning, China; Biosafety Level -3 Laboratory, Life Sciences Institute, Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, Nanning, China
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
Scopus
Artículo obtenido de:
Scopus
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo
Subscribirse
Notificación de