Artículo

Beyond declarations: Metrics, rankings and responsible assessment

Resumen

Responsible assessment promotes expert judgment and opposes sole reliance on research metrics when assessing research excellence. While many institutions and national research panels declare commitment to responsible assessment practices, we ask: have these declarations affected the outcomes of research evaluation? Using data from the UK’s 2021 national research quality exercise and focusing on the business and management discipline, we show that the strong association between journal rankings and expert evaluations has not changed, despite institutional endorsements of DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment). Additionally, we find that this correlation is strongest for the most prestigious journals. The implications of these findings are profound: they enhance understanding of the use of metrics in research evaluations post-DORA and highlight potential constraints in the deployment of responsible assessment.
Katelouzou, Dionysia (57202335151); Ren, Yanqiu (59364289000); Sagarra, Marti (56222453400)
A Bibliometric Analysis of Four Decades of Shareholder Activism Research
2024
10.1111/corg.12632
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85212232452&doi=10.1111%2fcorg.12632&partnerID=40&md5=2eb4b1ddf439b00fae6db126eb674749
The Dickson Poon School of Law, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Business, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
All Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access
Scopus
Artículo obtenido de:
Scopus
Fuente
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo
Campus Samborondón
Vía Samborondón Km. 13.5
Call Center: 5150400
metricas@ecotec.edu.ec
Facebook Instagram Youtube

Mapa del sitio