Artículo

Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic

Resumen

We present a large-scale comparison of five multidisciplinary bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. The comparison considers scientific documents from the period 2008–2017 covered by these data sources. Scopus is compared in a pairwise manner with each of the other data sources. We first analyze differences between the data sources in the coverage of documents, focusing for instance on differences over time, differences per document type, and differences per discipline. We then study differences in the completeness and accuracy of citation links. Based on our analysis, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the different data sources. We emphasize the importance of combining a comprehensive coverage of the scientific literature with a flexible set of filters for making selections of the literature.
de Oliveira Dias, Kalina Coeli Costa (57219159963); de Souza Batista, Patrícia Serpa (57219157934); Fernandes, Maria Andréa (57212429703); Zaccara, Ana Aline Lacet (55972735100); de Oliveira, Thaís Costa (57219165216); de Vasconcelos, Monica Ferreira (55843696600); de Magalhães Oliveira, Amanda Maritsa (57219159688); de Andrade, Fernanda Ferreira (57219157064)
Dissertations and theses on palliative care in pediatric oncology: a bibliometric study; [Dissertações e teses sobre cuidados paliativos em oncologia pediátrica: estudo bibliométrico]; [Tesis de maestría y doctorado sobre cuidados paliativos en oncología pediátrica: estudio bibliométrico]
2020
10.37689/ACTAAPE/2020AO02642
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85091521290&doi=10.37689%2fACTAAPE%2f2020AO02642&partnerID=40&md5=1c496b1635900cd1f2eeb5fc23c080c3
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
Scopus
Artículo obtenido de:
Scopus
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo