Artículo

Bibliometric and social network analysis of a Clinical and Translational Resource awardee: An Oklahoma experience 2014-2021

Resumen

Background: Social Network Analysis is a method of analyzing coauthorship networks or relationships through graph theory. Institutional Development Award (IDeA) Networks for Clinical and Translational Research (IDeA-CTR) was designed to expand the capability for clinical and translational research to enhance National Institutes of Health funding. Methods: All publications from a cohort of clinical and translational scientists in Oklahoma were collected through a PubMed search for 2014 through 2021 in October 2022. For this study’s bibliometric portion, we pulled the citations from iCite in November of 2022. Results: There were 2,391 articles published in 1,019 journals. The number of papers published by year increased from 56 in 2014 to 448 in 2021. The network had an average of 6.4 authors per paper, with this increasing by year from 5.3 in 2014 to 6.9 in 2021. The average journal impact factor for the overall network was 7.19, with a range from 0.08 to 202.73. The Oklahoma Shared Clinical and Translational Resources (OSCTR) network is a small world network with relatively weak ties. Conclusions: This study provides an overview of coauthorship in an IDeA-CTR collaboration. We show the growth and structure of coauthorship in OSCTR, highlighting the importance of understanding and fostering collaboration within research networks. © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Clinical and Translational Science.
Khamisy-Farah, Rola (55808741800); Gilbey, Peter (55980203000); Furstenau, Leonardo B. (57211463471); Sott, Michele Kremer (57218374403); Farah, Raymond (14013894800); Viviani, Maurizio (57231700200); Bisogni, Maurizio (57232852500); Kong, Jude Dzevela (56305065700); Ciliberti, Rosagemma (6507895664); Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi (57212030091)
Big data for biomedical education with a focus on the covid-19 era: An integrative review of the literature
2021
10.3390/ijerph18178989
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85113546517&doi=10.3390%2fijerph18178989&partnerID=40&md5=d9dcc718aa0b917324d63a4b1f8d88c9
Clalit Health Service, Akko, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, 13100, Israel; Azrieli Faculty of medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, 13100, Israel; Department of Industrial Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 90035-190, Brazil; Business School, Unisinos University, Porto Alegre, 91330-002, Brazil; Department of Internal Medicine B, Ziv Medical Center, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, 13100, Israel; TransHumanGene, MedicaSwiss, Cham, Zug, 6330, Switzerland; Laboratory for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (LIAM), Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, M3J 1P3, ON, Canada; Section of History of Medicine and Bioethics, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, 16132, Italy
All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access
Scopus
Artículo obtenido de:
Scopus
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo
Subscribirse
Notificación de