Artículo

Bibliometric study on nanoscience and nanotechnology in Mexico based on Web of Science

Resumen

It is evident that the nanosciences and nanotechnologies field will have a significant impact on various fields of action and will be linked to the development of a country, so their study is fundamental; On the other hand, the amount of information generated today makes it difficult to study a scientific topic. Therefore, information analysis tools are needed, both methodological and technological; in this context, metric methodologies are adequate to study a scientific field like this; Therefore, the present work aims to carry out a bibliometric study on the development of nanoscience and nanotechnology in Mexico based on the use of scientific mapping. Documentary analysis and the use of metric indicators of activity and relational indicators were used as methods and procedures. In the practical case, the data was taken from the Web of Science Database and Bibliometrix was used to develop the scientific-technological maps. We retrieved 15,876 research articles on N & N published between 1975 and 2021. The experimental results showed that they received an average of 17.61 citations per article, which were written in 2567 journals, more than 98% of the articles are written in English, and as for authors there is an average of 5.66 by document.
Gallegos, Ángeles (57189578385); Gavito, Mayra E. (6601998887); Ferreira-Medina, Heberto (55749919600)
Foliar Nitrogen Estimation with Artificial Intelligence and Technological Tools: State of the Art and Future Challenges
2024
10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150640
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85197714504&doi=10.14569%2fIJACSA.2024.0150640&partnerID=40&md5=11ecafae3b032141a423e7b8634eaee4
Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro, No. 8701 Col. San José de la Huerta C.P. Michoacán, Morelia, 58190, Mexico
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
Scopus
Artículo obtenido de:
Scopus
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo