Artículo

Telesupervision in Psychotherapy: A Bibliometric and Systematic Review

Resumen

Background: This systematic review supported by a bibliometric analysis identified quantitative and qualitative empirical studies that allowed us to respond to the objective of identifying and discussing the scope and limitations of the clinical-psychotherapeutic supervision in virtual modality or telesupervision. (2) Methods: The articles were selected according to the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the eligibility criteria proposed by the PICOS strategy (population, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and study design) based on 396 records of scientifically identified articles in the Journal Citation Report databases of the Web of Science. (3) Results: The literature review stages allowed the selection of three articles, which were added three others that were already included in a previous review, to enrich the analysis and discussion. The results of the present review highlighted aspects of nonverbal communication, alliance, comfort, preference, trust, and construction of professional identity, among others, both considering only the telesupervision format and comparing it with traditional face-to-face supervision. (4) Conclusions: The contributions that these results are providing to the understanding of the scope and limitations of the practice of telesupervision are discussed, also considering its interference in the construction of the professional identity of supervisors and supervisees.
Chavez, Henry (57213581521); Albornoz, María Belén (57192277503); Martín, Fernando (57746138000)
‘Big data’ Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scopus Database, 2009-2019
2022
10.5530/jscires.11.1.7
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85132106342&doi=10.5530%2fjscires.11.1.7&partnerID=40&md5=94cfb7404692c0b2ce9373f1b3b2d931
All Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access
Scopus
Artículo obtenido de:
Scopus
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo