Artículo

Legal research in question: A systematic review study

Resumen

This paper intends to check in what extent the articles published in the legal area journals have and make explicit methodological criteria recommended by the ABNT (Associaçao Brasileira de Normas Técnicas). We used an descriptive and exploratory study and bibliometric systematic review approach. We found that from the 241 published papers in legal paper journals, 37% of them do not presente the objective in the review, 61% do not make explicit the method and/or the methodology used to develop the research; and, at last, 61% do not presente the result and/or the conclusion. If, on the one hand, the recurring absence of these founding elements of research, in any area, tends to weaken and project itself as an obstacle to legal publications with scientific intentions, on the other, it makes visible the need for refinement of research in the legal area.
Bian, Jinhu (43561035200); Zhao, Jinping (59501798600); Li, Ainong (14519510100)
Remote sensing monitoring of mountain sustainable development goals (SDG15.4): a systematic review
2025
10.1080/17538947.2024.2448216
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85214201301&doi=10.1080%2f17538947.2024.2448216&partnerID=40&md5=2c670cf16564de87238b2feaebb01c1e
Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Wanglang Mountain Remote Sensing Observation and Research Station of Sichuan Province, Mianyang, China
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
Scopus
Artículo obtenido de:
Scopus
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo