Artículo

Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic

Resumen

We present a large-scale comparison of five multidisciplinary bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. The comparison considers scientific documents from the period 2008–2017 covered by these data sources. Scopus is compared in a pairwise manner with each of the other data sources. We first analyze differences between the data sources in the coverage of documents, focusing for instance on differences over time, differences per document type, and differences per discipline. We then study differences in the completeness and accuracy of citation links. Based on our analysis, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the different data sources. We emphasize the importance of combining a comprehensive coverage of the scientific literature with a flexible set of filters for making selections of the literature.
Jia, Hongying (59471412300)
A review of research progress in the design history of everyday life
2025
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40865
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85211984792&doi=10.1016%2fj.heliyon.2024.e40865&partnerID=40&md5=5c58bbe4f9ad1afbb0b67fb0223849fd
Tongji University, College of Design and Innovation, Shanghai, China
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
Scopus
Artículo obtenido de:
Scopus
Fuente
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo
Subscribirse
Notificación de
Campus Samborondón
Vía Samborondón Km. 13.5
Call Center: 5150400
metricas@ecotec.edu.ec
Facebook Instagram Youtube

Mapa del sitio