Artículo

Challenges with measures used for assessing research impact in higher education institutions

Resumen

Internationally, there has been a push for the prioritisation of research impact beyond its scholarly contribution. Traditionally, research impact assessments have focused on academic impact and quantitative measures, at the expense of researchers for whom research impact cannot be quantified. Bibliometric indicators and other quantitative measures are still the most widely used method for evaluating research impact because these measures are easy to use and provide a quick solution for evaluators. Conversely, metric indicators fail to capture important dimensions of high-quality research. Hence, in this study, we explored challenges with metric indicators. We adopted a case study of the University of Cape Town and used document analysis, a questionnaire survey to collect data from academics and researchers, as well as semi-structured interviews with a sample of academic and research staff. The findings highlight common challenges with quantitative measures, such as bias and discipline coverage, and the ability of measures to drive researchers’ behaviour in another direction. We propose the adoption of responsible research metrics and assessment in South African higher education institutions for more inclusive and equitable research impact assessments.
Jrade, Ahmad (12804778900); Jalaei, Farnaz (57212026747); Zhang, Jieying Jane (59228484300); Jalilzadeh Eirdmousa, Saeed (59228444800); Jalaei, Farzad (54894358100)
Potential Integration of Bridge Information Modeling and Life Cycle Assessment/Life Cycle Costing Tools for Infrastructure Projects within Construction 4.0: A Review
2023
10.3390/su152015049
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85199226134&doi=10.3390%2fsu152015049&partnerID=40&md5=b503d960a132c3df787b4cb99ad749dc
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, K1N 6N5, ON, Canada; National Research Council Canada, Government of Canada, Ottawa, K1A 0R6, ON, Canada
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
Scopus
Artículo obtenido de:
Scopus
0 0 votos
Califica el artículo